Search SAP Solutions

Solution Search:
Top 10 Reasons Customers Choose SAP for Business Transformation by SAP America Inc
SAP is a customer’s company, whose organization is designed for, and encouraging of, innovation in all its aspects - from...
SAP Data Migration Using Business Objects Information Management Software by SAP America Inc
software from Business Objects, an SAP company, for SAP data migration projects, either for upgrades from one version of SAP to a newer one, or from other...
Developing a mission-critical hardware strategy for your SAP environment by Hewlett-Packard Company
for maximum performance of your SAP environment? This eBook includes tips and insight from server, storage, virtualization and SAP software pros that will...
Fax as a 100% On-Demand Service: Integrated with SAP® Solutions by Esker Inc.
looking to integrate fax with SAP application no longer have to choose among efficiency, cost or functionality. SAP customers can take advantage of fax...
Current Articles

SAP customers considering a move back to Standard Support must weigh factors such as the rate of inflation and waived fees for extended support on older releases -- factors that could bring the two options to a similar cost over the next few years.

"There is a choice, but because of inflation, the differences between the tiers are not enough to give customers the value they want to see in the Standard Support offering," said Ray Wang, partner at Altimeter Group. "It's not really coming down to those decisions on what products are in place. The real thing that matters here is you're betting with or against inflation."

Direct customers must pick a maintenance and support option by March 15 in order to stay on the graduated Enterprise Support price ramp-up – which will increase fees to 22% by 2016. Channel customers have until April 30.

Standard Support costs 18% of net licensing fees now, but increases will be tied to inflation. A consumer price index increase above 3.5%, which would provide equal fees by 2016, isn't unrealistic, according to a recent Gartner Research note on the topic.

Choosing SAP Enterprise Support

Enterprise Support has advantages. Standard Support doesn't have an SLA for response time, said Bob... More...

Technology Definitions
ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming) is a programming language for developing applications for the SAP R/3 system, a widely-installed business application subsystem. The latest version, ABAP Objects, is object-oriented programming. SAP will run applications written using ABAP/4, the earlier ABAP version, as well as applications using ABAP Objects.

Ask your questions about ABAP at ITKnowledgeExchange.com

SAP's original business model for R/3 was developed before the idea of an object-oriented model was widespread. The transition to the object-oriented model reflects an increased customer demand for it. ABAP Objects uses a single inheritance model and full support for object features such as encapsulation, polymorphism, and persistence.

Getting started with ABAP To explore how ABAP is used in the enterprise, here are some additional resources: ABAP for newbies: Here is a collection of resources that will help you get started with this programming language. Which to learn first: XI, ABAP, or SD?: Confused on the whether you should learn ABAP, XI or SD? Here are some answers on the differences from a SearchSAP.com expert.. What SAP says about ABAP's future: Learn about how SAP sees ABAP's future. Podcast: How can ABAP developers survive in a NetWeaver era?: Learn what ABAP programmers need to know to stay current in a NetWeaver world. ABAP jobs and more: Special report: Learn how to get started in ABAP and keep your skills current.

ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming) is a programming language for developing applications for the SAP R/3 system, a widely-installed business application subsystem. (Continued...)
Business Information Warehouse (sometimes shortened to "Business Warehouse" or BW) is a packaged, comprehensive business intelligence product centered around a data warehouse that is optimized for (but not limited to) the R/3 environment from SAP.

Building an Enterprise Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Solution -- Click here to read the white paper

Like most data warehouses, BW is a combination of databases and database management tools that are used to support management decision making. BW supplies the infrastructure typical of data warehouses, but also includes preconfigured data extractors, analysis and report tools, and business process models. Among the other features of BW are: Business Application Programming Interfaces (BAPIs) that enable connections to non-R/3 applications; preconfigured business content; an integrated OLAP processor; automated data extraction and loading routines; a metadata repository; administrative tools; multiple language support; and Business Explorer, a Web-based user interface. SAP Business Warehouse is an integral component of the company's mySAP Business Intelligence group of products.

Business Information Warehouse (sometimes shortened to "Business Warehouse" or BW) is a packaged, comprehensive business intelligence product centered around a data warehouse that is optimized for (but not limited to) the R/3 environment from SAP. (Continued...)
ERP (enterprise resource planning) is an industry term for the broad set of activities that helps a business manage the important parts of its business. The information made available through an ERP system provides visibility for key performance indicators (KPIs) required for meeting corporate objectives. ERP software applications can be used to manage product planning, parts purchasing, inventories, interacting with suppliers, providing customer service, and tracking orders. ERP can also include application modules for the finance and human resources aspects of a business. Typically, an ERP system uses or is integrated with a relational database system.

The deployment of an ERP system can involve considerable business process analysis, employee retraining, and new work procedures.

Rebecca Gill, vice president of Technology Group International says:
"For almost twenty years we have had people ask for demonstration copies of our ERP software, so they may play with it at their leisure. For years we have said no and we've done so with good reason. An ERP package is an advanced system. It isn't Microsoft Office and it isn't an iPhone. You can't simply turn it on and expect it to run without training." ERP (enterprise resource planning) is an industry term for the broad set of activities supported by multi-module application software that helps a manufacturer or other business manage the important parts of its business, including product planning, parts purchasing, maintaining inventories, interacting with suppliers, providing customer service, and tracking orders...(Continued)

Enterprise Services Architecture (ESA) is SAP's enhanced version of service-oriented architecture (SOA). ESA facilitates deployment of Web services at the business level. This streamlines the conception and development of innovative application programs within the existing infrastructure of an enterprise, minimizing the cost while allowing timely implementation of new business processes.

The term SOA refers to the underlying structure supporting communications among units of work, also called services, executed on behalf of computing entities such as human users or applications. SOA defines how these entities can interact, allowing one to perform a specific service for another. The interactions are defined using a description language such as Unified Modeling Language (UML). Enterprise Services Architecture (ESA) is SAP's enhanced version of service-oriented architecture (SOA)... (Continued)

What is SAP?
SAP, started in 1972 by five former IBM employees in Mannheim, Germany, states that it is the world's largest inter-enterprise software company and the world's fourth-largest independent software supplier, overall.

Ask your SAP questions at ITKnowledgeExchange.com

The original name for SAP was German: Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte, German for "Systems Applications and Products." The original SAP idea was to provide customers with the ability to interact with a common corporate database for a comprehensive range of applications. Gradually, the applications have been assembled and today many corporations, including IBM and Microsoft, are using SAP products to run their own businesses.

SAP applications, built around their latest R/3 system, provide the capability to manage financial, asset, and cost accounting, production operations and materials, personnel, plants, and archived documents. The R/3 system runs on a number of platforms including Windows 2000 and uses the client/server model. The latest version of R/3 includes a comprehensive Internet-enabled package.

SAP has recently recast its product offerings under a comprehensive Web interface, called mySAP.com, and added new e-business applications, including customer relationship management (CRM) and supply chain management (SCM).

As of January 2007, SAP, a publicly traded company, had over 38,4000 employees in over 50 countries, and more than 36,200 customers around the world. SAP is turning its attention to small- and-medium sized businesses (SMB). A recent R/3 version was provided for IBM's AS/400 platform.

SAP, started in 1972 by five former IBM employees in Mannheim, Germany, states that it is the world's largest inter-enterprise software company and the world's fourth-largest independent software supplier, overall.
Featured Advice
What is the best practice for using adding menus to roles while keeping ongoing maintenance to a minimum? For example, our sales user base consists of 15 - 20 distinct roles, most of whom will want to see the exact same user menu. Do we create an empty role containing the menu and include it in all the roles? Do we maintain the menu in each of the roles?

Did SAP intend for each user to have exactly one role? Or, was it expected to have a combination of roles such as "Sales update + Finance display + MM display"?

I'm a developer and functional person and I'm not very strong on the security side. We are upgrading from 3.1 to 4.7 and have been shown very little with regard to how have some standard menu paths for our custom Z transactions across various user groups. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. This is really a great question and I appreciate you asking it. I like to think of myself somewhat of an menu-navigation evangelist when it comes to these issues. Here our my abridged thoughts (I could go on for hours on this)... first thing first: are you going to use SAP's Enterprise portal products? This could alter your design and approach. Lets assume not and I will save that lengthy discussion for another day (it is somewhat of an... More...
We are bringing a new subsidiary onto an existing SAP system. At this point, we believe that we will have one company code for each legal entity all pointing to a single controlling area. This being the case, our financial users are concerned with how we can restrict access per site; there will be multiple sites in each company code. The sites will be able to be broken out using the profit center hierarchy (one node for each site with multiple profit centers assigned). One argument that has been posed is to define each site as a company code because you can restrict access at the company code level. I believe there must be other alternatives. There really aren't many options here. A best practice will be to use the company code to represent true legal entities, any decision to have multiple company codes with in the same country or fiscal company should be based on finacial reporting rules; not security objectives. Your options are limited here to using business areas as a rollup for financial security; although many companies prefer not to configure and maintain this type of master data (so it is a little unorthodox). The real answer is that you need to have effective job segregation at the functional level with... More...
Best Web Links
Keeping accurate records in SAP's HR Personnel Administration is a critical position requiring extensive knowledge of human resource activities such as new hires, rehires, status changes, transfers, salary increases, promotions, leaves, and terminations. This quiz will allow an SAP Personnel Administration professional to gauge their knowledge and sharpen their skills. More...
This quiz is the final installment of a three-part quiz series on SAP BI/BW by expert Jay Narayanan. If you passed the beginner and intermediate quizzes, you are ready for this advanced-level quiz. More...
This quiz on customers and call centers will test CRM beginners' knowledge about common industry terms and practices. Start with this quiz to evaluate your general CRM savvy, then read detailed explanations of the correct answers to get a firmer grasp on the fundamentals of the CRM market More...
Q&A Interviews
SearchSAP: Are there specific business issues that are driving upgrades to mySAP ERP 2005?

There are several aspects. First, customers now understand the new functionality more. Second, the whole roadmap of 2005 is the go to release. Now users know that they can have a stable platform for the foreseeable future. Also, the enhancement packs on top of that so that users have a choice and don't have functionality forced on them.

And don't forget the enterprise SOA [service-oriented architecture] angle. It's something where, from a technical point of view, this can help companies drive globalization, their divestiture, and their integration over all topics, for example. And this is a business process platform -- not a technical platform -- that can give users the tools and techniques to make use of the SOA concept.
What are some of the common challenges that companies are facing in their upgrades?

We've really seen the upgrade challenges more on the project management side, so it's important to have a good project manager and project plan in place.

Secondly, get the business involved. Don't perceive the upgrade as something to get done in the data center. Perceive it as something where the customers -- the users -- have to be involved and, to a certain extent, even drive the process.

Thirdly, testing is still a major challenge. Get the respective resources from the user community and drive it from the user perspective and not an IT perspective.

From a technical point of view, really look at your landscape and at the implications the upgrade might have for your landscape. So you're not all of a sudden faced with the challenge that you've upgraded R/3 to mySAP ERP and then find out there's maybe something else you have to upgrade as well.
Why should users upgrade to mySAP ERP 2005 instead of mySAP ERP 2004?

It starts with maintenance. If you look at the maintenance piece, right now you are able to sit on the release much longer, which gives you, to a certain extent, a better return on investment. Also, with [mySAP ERP] 2005 you still have the flexibility to introduce new functionality. Those are two main things that you can't do with [mySAP ERP] 2004.

On top of that, look at all the effort SAP is putting into it. All the efforts within SAP are clearly focused right now toward 2005, the respective enhancement packages, and switch frame technology to integrate industry solutions. So the investments in regards to making 2005 a robust business process platform toward 2010 and beyond is something you can't find within 2004.

Therefore customers who are in the midst of a 2004 upgrade project should look at whether it would be a good idea to go to 2005. And that's really a very strong point for us. 2004 is a good release, but there are things you don't get, and consequently it's not enterprise SOA, and you won't see 2004 going toward enterprise SOA.
How will mySAP ERP 2005 upgrading affect SAP professionals and job seekers, and do you have any advice for them?

My personal advice is that there is a shift in what IT people will be doing. It will become a stronger business environment -- business process engineering, business process knowledge, business process optimization, processes within enterprises, processes beyond enterprises, networking with other IT departments to make those cross-enterprise processes work. So there will be much more on that side of the coin beyond just technology. That's one element.

The second element is still technology. The shift from a normal programming kind of environment into a service-oriented composing environment again requires business content knowledge compared to technical programming knowledge, which is another challenge and opportunity to grow into.

Last but not least, you still have to have a strong technical platform. Optimization, performance and a stable environment will become even more important. Also, given the fact that the access to data within the organization -- and we are seeing this more with enterprise SOA -- is now going from the BlackBerry device all the way down to the normal PC and browser environment. So there are some other technology areas [where] you see skills really becoming valuable.
How will mySAP ERP 2005 upgrading affect SAP professionals and job seekers, and do you have any advice for them?

I will add two more things to that point. One, there are certain solutions to look at -- think about Duet or Adobe forms, for instance -- from a technology perspective. Two, we see a huge amount of interest in GRC (governance, risk and compliance).

I would really encourage people to broaden their more or less classic SAP knowledge. If they look into the areas I mentioned, they should be in very good shape from a career perspective in the years ahead.

And on the SAP side, last year we launched the business process expert community. More than 60,000 people have signed up. I think there is a significant demand out there for this type of skill set. You can play a different role, as Martin said, and be a key user that understands business process requirements and can model them. We are building tools like visual composer that can be used. The SAP expert role will be different two years from now than it was two years ago.


How will mySAP ERP 2005 upgrading affect SAP professionals and job seekers, and do you have any advice for them?

I also want to stress the compliance topic. It becomes really an integrated part of IT, where in the past, maybe, it wasn't so prominent. Now, at the end of the day, compliance is something that business users have to take care of, but IT has to facilitate -- because the business and IT components really have to be merging.
Speaking of compliance, do you have any thoughts on what users should look out for?

The point is, really, what does compliance mean? It's really something where the company needs to think about the processes and structures in place, and then the tools are more or less the second choice. I will say it is easier when you have a vendor that is paying attention to the compliance topic.

It is something that has to be driven and comes from the business side, so it has not been a prominent IT topic. But, as I said, it is very important to have vendors, and I think SAP is one of those that are really able to address the topic and support the business.


DENVER -- At the start of the Americas' SAP Users' Group (ASUG) mySAP ERP 2005 Upgrade Symposium this week, Martin Riedel, head of SAP's global upgrade office, and Stefan Kneis, vice president and ASUG executive liaison, discussed some issues facing customers who are considering upgrading to mySAP ERP 2005, how upgrades may affect the SAP jobs market, and the growing importance of compliance.

More...

Why is retail identified as a big growth area for SAP?

It's important for a couple of different reasons. The market as a whole is largely untapped from a packaged application perspective. If you look at the retail landscape as a whole, 60% of retailers are using internally developed applications. As a result of that, both SAP and Oracle are aware of this market statistic, and we're looking to grow into that space nicely. When you combine the relative under-penetration of packaged applications with the overall market potential, the opportunities are clear.
Manhattan, Lawson, CRS Retail, GERS and Retalix have aggressively expanded their own footprints through acquisitions. What's the value-add for going with a large ERP vendor over some of these niche vendors?

If you want to be in the business of integrating applications, then go with our competitors. If you want to optimize your opportunities as a retailer and have happy, satisfied, productive employees and really reliable customers, then you want to buy SAP. It's two totally different strategies. Companies like Beall's understand that retaining and attracting customers is a priority.
Doesn't it make sense for a retailer to choose a point solution based on its specific areas or needs?

I don't think there will be a day when a retailer will come to a single vendor for all their situations. There's always going to be small niche vendors out there to provide the smaller applications that retailers need. You can have a very nice core infrastructure of SAP applications and choose a point solution such as planogram visual merchandizing application or cashier productivity tool -- areas where there's not enough enterprise requirement for SAP to invest in that space.
Why has SAP taken an acquisition approach in Retail, much like Oracle, as opposed to the rest of its product offerings?

We've had two acquisitions, and they were both tuck-in acquisitions. From an industry perspective, we've been active with acquisitions, but from a company [perspective], it isn't a lot of acquisitions. There are white-space areas that we are investigating and customers are asking us to be more active in. One example is the area around planogramming or visual merchandising, but I'm not making a comment that we're … actively looking to make an acquisition. A second area is the area of perishables, and this is where we're actively looking to complete our portfolio.
Is SAP on track in integrating the Triversity and Khimetrics acquisitions?

We'll be shipping an integrated version of the Triversity applications and SAP in December. It will be a complete integration between all Triversity and SAP applications. We will also have four or five customers live with that integrated suite. If you are a Triversity customer, you can stick with what you have. If you're a Triversity-SAP customer, then you have the ability to leverage prepackaged integration. Integration between Khimetrics and SAP is complete and available.
What is the state of adoption of SAP Master Data Management among retailers?

We have north of 10 retailers in the U.S. that are also Master Data Management customers. Most retailers are looking for a way to understand the needs of the customer across all the channels that they sell. Chico's, which has not currently deployed this functionality, has three brands, and it would be interesting for them to tap into the data to know about the customer who shops among those various brands. The Home Depot is also very interested in understanding as much as they can about overall purchasing habits of their customers, and a product like MDM allows that to happen.
SAP and Oracle have been at each other's throats in the retail industry and both vendors have been acquiring firms to build out specific retail functionality and broaden their footprints in the market. Jim McMurray, SAP's senior vice president for retail, is on the front line of that battle. In an interview with SearchSAP.com, McMurray wouldn't rule out further acquisitions, but he said certain areas will always be addressed by point solutions, rather than prepackaged software. More...

What do you think of Oracle and SAP's different strategies with regard to SOA?

I think they both have good strategies, but they're different strategies. SAP's strategy is very focused on the SAP applications and how to make the SAP applications more flexible and adaptable. What's the goal behind SOA? It's to make systems more flexible and adaptable. Now if you're not an applications company, you're not necessarily focused only on [SAP's] applications, you're focused on more of the infrastructure-related stuff. But SAP, being SAP, is most concerned with how to make the SAP applications more desirable and less of a challenge for the average company.
In what other ways is SAP leveraging SOA to make its applications more attractive?

Not very long ago, you'd expect it to take 18 to 24 months to install SAP and get it up and running. That's just ludicrous. You should be able to install this thing, get it up and running and have it actually customized to your corporate way of business in a reasonable timeframe. That's really where SAP is coming from: How can they use SOA to improve the architecture of their application systems so that people using their application systems can actually get this stuff to work more easily and customize it to match the internal business processes? [SAP has] been focusing more on that business process modeling aspect and the ability to customize that business process. And they're really focused on semantics -- the semantics of that business process. They've got a really rich repository-based and model-based approach to SOA.
What is the difference between business process modeling and business process management?

Modeling is really just a representation of the business process. If you have a business process management suite, that management suite might automate that process for you. But the model exists whether you're using an internal business process management suite or you're just writing it in code. But if you really want to be able to rapidly change a business process, you need to model. SAP doesn't have a business process management suite. They don't have [something similar to BEA Systems' Fuego application or Lombardi Software's offering], they just say, "Here are our business processes, here is how they're implemented, here is how they're tied together and here is how you can adapt them."
How does Oracle's approach to SOA differ from SAP's strategy?

Oracle has a much more diverse and more open approach. They've got their applications, they've got the Siebel applications and they've got [about] 20 other applications that they've acquired over the last six months, and those systems are not integrated yet. And it's going to be a long time before Oracle manages to get them nicely integrated. They have not gone through the process of actually modeling all of the processes that are within these application systems. They don't have these tools that allow you to very simply go in and say I need to adjust this process in this way. That is one of SAP's strengths right there, but the thing is that it only works with SAP applications.
You're basically saying that SAP is currently doing a better job of modeling processes within application systems. Does Oracle make up for this lack of process modeling in other areas?

What Oracle has instead are some modeling tools, the Business Process Execution Language engine that they acquired with Collaxa, and open middleware, open database and open other stuff which you can now use to build new applications, integrate existing applications, model existing applications and make changes to the existing applications. That's not just Oracle applications, but any applications. That is a plus, except that they don't have all of the semantic knowledge predefined, which means that you need to go in and define all of this semantic information and do all of this modeling yourself. Oracle is a database company. Oracle is a middleware company. Oracle is an identity management company. Oracle is an applications company. So they've got a much broader portfolio of products than SAP which is essentially an applications company with a platform that goes with it.
Suppose that I'm a brand new company with no major investments in either Oracle or SAP and I want to start down the path to SOA. Which of these two rival companies should I look into?

If you're looking for a more turnkey solution, I think that SAP is going to give you a faster solution. But if you're looking for more flexibility, then Oracle is going to give you a better solution.
Interest in the service-oriented architecture (SOA) approach to software deployments continues to grow rapidly, and business applications giants Oracle and SAP AG are each vying for position at the forefront of the movement with two distinctly different SOA philosophies, according to one expert. Anne Thomas Manes, a vice president and research director with Midvale, Utah-based Burton Group, says that companies looking for a quicker SOA fix can turn to SAP, which focuses its SOA efforts on internal SAP applications. But companies looking for greater flexibility and support for third-party applications over the long haul will likely find that Oracle is the better choice, she said. The increasing adoption of the SOA methodology shows no signs of waning. Framingham, Mass.-based research firm IDC predicts that the market for SOA-related services will reach $8.6 billion in 2006, a figure more than twice that of last year. Experts attribute the growing interest in SOA to the methodology's promise to save firms' money by eliminating redundancy among enterprise applications. SearchOracle.com recently spoke with Manes, an SOA expert, about the plusses and minuses of Oracle and SAP's differing approaches to SOA. She also had some advice for companies trying to decide where to turn for their SOA needs. More...